https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156099
V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |rb.hensc...@t-online.de,
| |so...@libreoffice.org,
| |vsfo...@libreoffice.org
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> ---
Actually ODF 1.3 sec. 10.5 provides our 3D Shape handling. And 10.5.7 [1]
defines "a three-dimensional rotation shape based on the given polygon" as
implemented in source with lathe3d.hxx
All the strings used for 3D shapes are consistently defined [2] as Objects.
So, there is no error in translation. And IMHO in this context "rotation
object" is more appropriate than the more convoluted "solid of revolution"
which while lexically correct adds nothing to the UI or the UX.
Term change would also trigger l10n translator thrash.
IMHO => WF
=-ref-=
[1]
https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/os/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-os-part3-schema.html#element-dr3d_rotate
[2]
https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/include/svx/strings.hrc?a=true&r=d0a9d04d&h=139#139
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
