https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156278
Michael Stahl (allotropia) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Hyperlinks and footers are |Hyperlinks and footnotes |not converted the same way |are not converted the same |anymore |way anymore --- Comment #6 from Michael Stahl (allotropia) <[email protected]> --- that's a feature - hyperlinks are converted into PDF Link annotations (obviously), and footnotes as well (2 links, from the reference to the footnote, and back). the PDF Link annotation only describes a rectangular area of the page that can be clicked (if the reader supports it), and it has this additional "Contents" entry to specify an alternative text description. > Michael, the commit message makes it sound like the change was only directed > at > PDF/UA, but even a non-UA export includes these annotations. > Was that intended? the PDF/UA setting actually has very little effect, almost everything relevant is already enabled by "Tagged PDF"; but the annotations aren't even governed by that, they are always produced, and nobody ever saw a problem with that. trying Okular, Evince, Chromium, Firefox, none of them display anything visible for these annotations; perhaps it's an UI problem with PSPDFkit? ISO 32000-2:2020(E), 12.5.6.2 Markup annotations > As mentioned in 12.5.2, "Annotation dictionaries", the meaning of an > annotation’s Contents entry > varies by annotation type. Typically, it is the text that shall be displayed > for the annotation or, if the > annotation does not display text, an alternative description of the > annotation’s contents in human- > readable form. In either case, the Contents entry is useful when extracting > the document’s contents in > support of accessibility to users with disabilities or for other purposes > (see 14.9.3, "Alternate > descriptions"). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
