https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112973
Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
Status|RESOLVED |NEW
--- Comment #15 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #14)
> We only support R/B/I/BI font family model
Which is a bug.
> for various legacy and compatibility reasons
Legacy, in the sense that this is how it was implemented before? That's not
much of an argument.
As for compatibility - the 2x2 dichotomy would simply be translated into a more
expressive font selection information. That's part of the required work.
> and that is why families with styles other than these
> four get handles as separate font families. This is intentional and not a bug.
It's a bug, even if done intentionally. Done intentionally" just means someone
made the wrong call. It is unreasonable for an office suite to just decide it
won't properly support things like a style for making one's font oblique, or
increasing the weight to a certain fraction of the maximum etc., because of an
ugly "jerry-rigging" of variants into a separate font family.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
