https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156438
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #2) > > I disagree. > > Disagree with what part of what we said? With the proposal from comment 0, given the absence of a specific reference, *obviously*. > > Enabling Asian support means user is interested in respective > > options/properties. So showing the properties should be independent on any > > file content / system configuration in this case. > > Yes, but that's true for RTL-CTL as well. Is the user's interest in CJK > always stronger than their interest in RTL-CTL? Given that we know each other, let me believe that your words were not an attempt to make me look bad, and you truly needed a "same for other groups" remark in my comment, which took your wording from comment 0 as an example... Still I don't believe that you couldn't guess that, so still clueless what was the purpose of this specific question. > If the user enabled both, > they will sometimes work on RTL-mostly documents, and will want to see the > RTL font first and foremost; and sometime work on CJK-mostly documents and > will want to see the CJK font first and foremost. Having something active is the usual approach when someone wants something "first and foremost", not hiding something else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
