https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156863
--- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- Reading you, I know I should feel lucky that I'm not yet in that state of mind where I'd create an ODT document with the sole aim of leaving it as it is, without any changes, and finally save it, or else do exactly the action you're suggesting to me. Is it so challenging to think that we would not have the present report or even any report to be sent to Canonical if someone had had to act as-per your very suggestion. Strange that on this platform it's worth wondering once again who among us is a developer and a user who is also a non-developer. I, by simply reading and viewing the content of my attachment, without any fancy trick, could simply - see this sentence: "(...) A transparent object was painted opaque instead.", which does implicitly refer to a non-empty document. - deduce that this message can only be displayed in this same condition that was met when I reported, thus the document with a file extension supported by Writer must not be empty since it must contain the object that Writer identified. Should someone still need my guidance to get the trivial answer; No, you can't expect this message to be triggered with an empty document nor you'll ever get it. So, better to try it yourself if you feel you need it yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
