https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157427
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1) > I kind of would expect *some* differences scaling those "proportional" > metrics between a display at 1280 x 800 (1.6 ratio) compared to a 1920 x > 1024 (1.875 ratio). That should not be the case for two reasons: 1. The slides' dimensions are defined in the presentation. The monitor they're viewed on should not matter. That is, of course the zoom level and resolution may affect how much of the slide we see on screen, or whether there are "slack" bars, vertical or horizontal, with no content. But that should not affect any of the font sizes, the number of lines required for each paragraph, and the relative vertical or horizontal positioning of slide elements. 2. In principle, the relative positioning of document elements (e.g. slide objects and paragraphs within them) must not depend on the machine on which one opens the presentation. If there's anything which causes this to happen (assuming all fonts are available etc.) - whatever the mechanism is, it's buggy. > Question would be if you get a similar shift when the font/line space metric > is set to 100%/single so the scaling of the font metric is removed from the > mix? I'll check the effect of dropping the proportional line spacing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
