https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157549

            Bug ID: 157549
           Summary: Shadow in Impress table borders is inconsistent when
                    cell background is set to None
           Product: LibreOffice
           Version: 7.6.0.3 release
          Hardware: All
                OS: All
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Impress
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

This is a follow up after bug 150557 was fixed.

Open attachment 181975 from bug 150557. It has 2 tables formatted with borders
using Transparency = 0%.

The cells in the table on the left have background color set to "Color" and
"white". The table has shadow using Red color and transparency set to 0%.
Notice that the shadows are indeed consistent with 0% transparency.

The table on the right is a copy of the table on the left, but the cell
background was set to None. Notice that now the shadows are fainter and are not
consistent with 0% transparency. It appears that some transparency is still
being applied, even though transparency is set to 0%.

To reproduce this issue:
1) Select all cells in the table on the left
2) Using the toolbar, set the color to None
3) Notice that the shadow now has some transparency (although transparency is
set to 0%)
4) To check that, right-click the table, go to Table Properties - Shadow

System info

Version: 7.6.2.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 60(Build:1)
CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Ubuntu package version: 4:7.6.2~rc1-0ubuntu0.23.04.1~lo1
Calc: threaded

Also present in

Version: 24.2.0.0.alpha0+ (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 1cf500366e8de4c1c89c1f9235629d2efeaa89af
CPU threads: 16; OS: Linux 6.2; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb)
Locale: pt-BR (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US
Calc: CL threaded

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to