https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157517

--- Comment #11 from peter.wy...@pdfa.org ---
I asked the VeraPDF team and this is what they said:

* Attachment 189889 has PDF/A identification XMP, but no PDF/UA identification
XMP => passes PDF/A validation (veraPDF), but doesn’t pass PDF/UA validation
(both veraPDF and PAC2021)

* Attachment 189890 has both PDF/A and PDF/UA identification XMPs, BUT has no
extension schema for PDF/UA identification => fails PDF/A validation because it
uses metadata property “pdfuaid:part” not defined nor in predefined in XMP
specs, neither in any embedded extension schemas. Passes PDF/UA validation
(both veraPDF and PAC2021).  

The main issue is that with some combination of version and settings
LibreOffice adds both PDF/A and PDF/UA identification XMPs but fails to add the
extension schema for pdfuaid properties required for PDF/A compliance. 

I added an attachment which is one of the files from PDF/UA reference suite,
which complies to both PDF/A-2A and PDF/UA-1 and in particular contains the
necessary XMP extension schema.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to