https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157337
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) > b) want macros to behave consistently Cosistent behavior of API means its behavior should not change without a great need. No one ever asked .uno:InsertDateField to change its behavior; the *only* request was in the dialog. And your change must not extend to the UNO. > The UNO command needs > a) to default to what the user chose recently (see also bug 157420) and b) > to take a parameter for independent macros. No. It's very unusual to say, but it's you who is now trying to bloat it without even a request from users ;) > But it still keeps UI and > internal processing coupled. So we perhaps have to bloat the API and add > .uno:InsertVariableTimeField (same for Date) with keeping/reverting > uno:InsertTimeField to the fixed values. No. Just make it simple. Fix the old UNO, and do not introduce anything else. If users need more flexibility, the API has the means, that were working for ages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
