https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157809
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97 | |991, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12 | |4992, | |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 | |2877 --- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #2) > I think I saw inverse report (to have all language packs in one DMG > installer) Here it is for MSI: bug 124992. No idea about DMG. > Mike, what do you think about this one? I think it is absolutely unclear what specific difficulties the organization may encounter. Errors? Precious megabytes consumed on disk? What? I don't believe there's a real reason to insist that today's applications must avoid inclusion of some information. It is OK to just install everything. It is also OK to use the installer-provided mechanism to only install a specific subset. But if the organization uses some custom procedure, what is the rationale, and the reason for that, which justifies a huge maintenance burden on the community of volunteers? (I'd expect organizations using FLOSS to *suggest* their contributions, not to ask volunteers to increase burden to support niche use cases.) See also: bug 142877, bug 97991. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
