https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157606

Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |stephane.guillou@libreoffic
                   |                            |e.org
           Priority|medium                      |low
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
           Severity|normal                      |minor

--- Comment #10 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) 
<[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Andrew Lentvorski from comment #3)
> I also presumed that support already existed and the bug was in advertising
> rather than implementation.  Gnumeric for example advertises:
> [...]
> application/x-openoffice-biff-8;windows_formatname="Biff8"
> _CITRIX_Biff8
> Biff8
> [...]
> I assumed that the existence of
> "application/x-openoffice-biff-8;windows_formatname="Biff8"" in Gnumeric was
> not spurious.  Of course, you know what they say about "Assume" ...

I tested OpenOffice.org 3.3 and I get:

xclip -selection clipboard -t TARGETS -o
text/plain;charset=utf-8
text/plain;charset=UTF-8
UTF-8
UTF8_STRING
COMPOUND_TEXT
STRING
application/x-openoffice-embed-source-xml;windows_formatname="Star Embed Source
(XML)"
application/x-openoffice-objectdescriptor-xml;windows_formatname="Star Object
Descriptor
(XML)";classname="47BBB4CB-CE4C-4E80-a591-42d9ae74950f";typename="calc8";viewaspect="1";width="4517";height="851";posx="0";posy="0"
application/x-openoffice-gdimetafile;windows_formatname="GDIMetaFile"
application/x-openoffice-emf;windows_formatname="Image EMF"
application/x-openoffice-wmf;windows_formatname="Image WMF"
application/x-openoffice-bitmap;windows_formatname="Bitmap"
PIXMAP
image/bmp
text/html
application/x-openoffice-sylk;windows_formatname="Sylk"
application/x-openoffice-link;windows_formatname="Link"
application/x-openoffice-dif;windows_formatname="DIF"
text/richtext
MULTIPLE

... so it doesn't look we ever supported it as a target.

So, seeing this, Mike's input and Andrew's last comment, I'd say this is a
"won't fix". I agree open standards should be promoted for anything coming out
of LO. If there are issues with formatting and formulas not being copied
properly from LO to other software, let's focus on those issues and fix our
existing targets.

Thank you!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to