https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=157971

            Bug ID: 157971
           Summary: CALC FORMATTING? Alphanumeric sorting only produces
                    the correct result if the numbers don't exceed 9
           Product: LibreOffice
           Version: 7.5.7.1 release
          Hardware: All
                OS: Windows (All)
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: medium
         Component: Calc
          Assignee: [email protected]
          Reporter: [email protected]

Description:
Yes, I do know the difference between alpha sorting and numeric sorting but
surely the result should be what a human requires, not what some 200-year-old
IEEE specification demands.

Attached is a simple file with four index columns.

Index 1 is what probably everybody on the planet understands when translated
into their own numbering system.

Index 2 is produced by filling it down and again is what everybody would
expect.

Index 3 is also produced by filling down but with an intentional change from
lower to upper case at the first numerical increment.

Index 4 adds another "phase" to the number for good measure.

Understand that the fill-down function correctly interprets the requirement as
it successfully produced the results indicated.

Sorting Ascending  A-Z on indices 1 & 2 has no impact - although they may both
be used to return the corrupted list to an acceptable condition following
"sorting" Ascending A-Z on the other two.

It would be nice to be able to say the same about Indices 3 & 4.

Would it not be worth doing it right instead of copying everybody else's
mistakes?

I'm uncertain whether the big boys would consider this to be related in some
way to Bug50786

Steps to Reproduce:
Play with the filter buttons B1:E1 on the attached sheet

Actual Results:
Unacceptable sort

Expected Results:
Acceptable sort


Reproducible: Always


User Profile Reset: No

Additional Info:
Version: 7.5.7.1 (X86_64) / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 47eb0cf7efbacdee9b19ae25d6752381ede23126
CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19045; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win
Locale: sv-SE (en_GB); UI: en-GB
Calc: threaded

I will understand if it's defined as an enhancement rather than a bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to