https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158253
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #5) > Not getting the need to remove the Shape category from the Gallery deck. I did not suggest that's what should happen. What I'm asking for is discussion, and a clearer/better conception of the delimitation of functionality: What should go where. > Point is there is a continued distinction between the Sidebar Shapes deck > and the Shapes content panel of the Gallery deck--they server different work > flows and are the target for extension content. Think of the residual > Gallery -> Shapes panel as a place holder for previous "clipart" and future > artwork contributions. That is what I'm thinking; but a lot of what I'm seeing in Gallery > Shapes doesn't fit the definition of art, but of more basic shapes (sometimes with arbitrary styling for the sense of variety, which is IMHO just a useless distraction) - which I expect elsewhere. Or which I actually _see_ elsewhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
