https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152583
--- Comment #3 from Li <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kevin Suo from comment #2) > (In reply to Li from comment #0) > For footnote and endnote, you can change the "Before" and "After" characters > of the numbering list in: > Tools > Footnote and Endnote. > > Just type in "[" in the "Before" box and "]" in the "After" box. > > In order to make Writer to use the [1], [2], [3] numbering style for Chinese > documents by default, we need to set templates. We now have a default > Chinese template named "Simplified Chinese Normal" under the "Localization" > template category (File > Template > Manage Template), you can right click > that template and set it to default template for Writer. However that > template currently still uses the default 1,2,3 style numbering for footnote > and endnote. I can prepare a patch to let that template use [1], [2], [3] > style footnote and endnote, but shall I set it to both footnote and endnote, > or only for endnote? The standard I mentioned (GB/T 7714-2015) only concerns how to list reference materials in endnotes. I think there are generally less restrictions and more down to one's preference when it comes to footnotes. As far as I know, circled digits could be the most common footnote numbering style in Simplified Chinese publications. With that said, it certainly won't hurt to have more options available. There is an industry standard (CY/T 121-2015) that mentioned [1], [2], [3] format as an option, so someone can potentially utilize it if it's also available as a footnote numbering style. Thanks! GB/T 7714-2015: https://github.com/saccohuo/GBT-Standard/blob/c01ae2e9b9596e470d21c39b014c3cf6c5ffcb1f/GBT%207714-2015%20%E4%BF%A1%E6%81%AF%E4%B8%8E%E6%96%87%E7%8C%AE%20%E5%8F%82%E8%80%83%E6%96%87%E7%8C%AE%E8%91%97%E5%BD%95%E8%A7%84%E5%88%99.pdf CY/T 121-2015: https://journal.scu.edu.cn/info/1253/1226.htm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
