https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154492
--- Comment #18 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #17) > I suggest, as a first step: > - a better name, but retaining the term "style". What about a compromise > like "Presentation element styles" or "Presentation component styles"? Both are less confusing than what we have now, but still not good enough IMHO for two reasons: 1. Too long. 2. That being said - I like the second option over the first. Additional options: * "Slide component styles" * "Slide element styles" * "Slide components" * "Slide master elements" * "Master elements" the benefit of the last three options is that it creates a better distinction between the other style categories and this one, while not claiming these are not styles. It would seem to the user like a way to format presentation components generally, which is not DF. > (Using "Presentation" instead of "Slide" as it affects the whole > presentation.) I get that, but think it's not necessary, because the list of names makes it clear it's not only about what's in the _current_ slide, just like everything else in the styles sidebar affects the entire presentation. > If a deeper change is needed, let's outline that in a clearer, new report. Actually, I wish we could discuss this at the design meeting some time. But a rename will resolve this bug AFAIAC. > Note that "Presentation Styles" was already used in OOo 3.3, and that > "Master Elements" should be avoided as it is already in the UI: Slide > > Master Elements... Actually, that's not half bad! Because it's not the "Master Elements..." command; it's a label at the top of a part of the styles sidebar. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
