https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148245
Cor Nouws <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #6 from Cor Nouws <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #0) > OTOH, this could be unneeded (or its need at least somewhat > lessened), if we extend our "not same content on left/right/first page" page > style setting to mean really different headers/footers/ not only content > (which, I believe, is possible with ODF, but not supported in LO),... Miklos knows more on the background. (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #5) > Actually, almost no user ever needs "Left page"'s or "Right page"'s as they > exist currently. I doubt. > There are mis-named and mis-designed artifacts which were > added at some point without sufficient thought and need to be removed / > revamped-and-renamed. 'Left' and 'Right' is in various cases not factual correct indeed. It is a concept however that is understandable. > While this can be be achievable by an alternating sequence of page styles, I > would claim that this should be just a single page style. Page styles > already support differences between alternating pages (although - in a way > that's either vague and confusing or just broken, haven't fully checked): The 'different first page' doesn't cater for the use case that Mike suggests. It is a copy of the Ms Word behavior, basically not needed since we can define a style sequence. > I support this latter option. But - once we remove the "Left Page" / "Right > Page" styles, and replace the "Left Page" / "Right Page" mess in UI labels > with something meaningful, ... Do you have a suggestion for an alternative naming? cheers - Cor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
