https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #13 from pb <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Yuri from comment #12) > Stating that an interoperability -bug- is "not a bug" looks contradictory: > how a type of bug is not a bug? This is a self-debunking statement. > > Well, I made my case on comment #7 and I stand by it: metainformation > shouldn't be resized when the user resizes its corresponding information > because these are two separate entities, and the authoritative norms about > it agree with me, which means that the default LibreOffice behaviour should > be to -not- resize metainformation (i.e. headers and footers) along with its > corresponding information (i.e. the "body" data of the e.g. spreadsheet). > > If I were a developer, I would've definitely contributed to fixing this bug. > Since I'm not a developer, I can only contribute with reporting the bug and > financially supporting the project through financial donations. However, > even though I did use to donate to the Document Foundation, and despite the > fact that I still appreciate and thank the efforts of the true developers > who still do actual work on this project, since this bug came out and spent > more than a decade without any fixing, I've been gradually moving to other > solutions and currently don't make financial donations to this project > anymore. > > If something as (apparently) minor as this can't be fixed in 10+ years, then > there's no reason why I should take LibreOffice, it's development and > financial donations to its project as seriously as this bug has so far been > taken by those who have the power to fix it. While this is not exactly the place for discussing this, I agree with the sentiment above. After enormous amounts of time fighting bugs in LibreOffice for years, I finally realized that I had better things to do. While it's nice to be able to report bugs, it's infuriating that bug reviewers invariably ignore the bug or claim it isn't a bug, and even if they do, the bug is never fixed. I even have looked at the code in case I might be able to fix something myself, but there is no documentation I could find that would help me understand the architecture of the code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
