https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158728
--- Comment #6 from Jambunathan K <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #5) > (In reply to Jambunathan K from comment #4) > > ... Of course, LibreOffice should provide a means for creating this `odt` or > > `ott` file. > > Based on how much demand is this "of course"? WONTFIX IMO. No real use case, > other than for a single person in the universe The comment makes an assumption that each style is unto its own and need not be harmonized with other styles. Here is a rhetorical question ... How would LO team (or a user such as me) ensure that the default styles are co-ordinated? If there is no means to inspect "default styles" of LO, why provide "default stlyes" at all? ---- For example, indentation level of 'Text Body' has to be co-ordinated with "Indentation level" of where the List Bullets occur. Not only the indentation levels, but the trailing whitespace following a paragraph should also need to be co-ordinated. The fact that list styles like `List 1`, `List 1 Cont`, `List 1 End` and `List Start` etc exists points to why the trailing whitespace needs to be "rhythmic". Btw, the comment makes an implicit statement that - LO team has no QA utilities to verify that default styles "gel" with one another. (If there is no utility to get a "bird's eye view" of all styles in action--which is exactly what this bug proposes--how does LO team ensure that the default styles are satisfactory) The comment also make an assumption that - the "Style designer" has no role in LO ecosystem, and that he has NO RIGHT TO inspect, adopt, or critique the default LO styles. This bug is best reviewed not by a developer, but a product manager or someone who routinely creates / reviews document styles, and has responsibility to ensure that the styles go along together. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
