https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158713
Telesto <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10 | |8820 Regression By| |Justin Luth Version|7.1.8.1 release |7.1.0.3 release Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected --- Comment #8 from Telesto <[email protected]> --- Bisected to: tdf#108820 sw layout: no ftn fieldshading in repeated header IsFootnoteAllowed() removes the footnote marker from the repeated table headers, but it didn't remove the view menu -> field shadings background. NewExtraPortion() is the only function that calls NewFootnotePortion(), and it will create a blank FieldPortion is nullptr is returned, so return a null FoonotePortion instead so that we can test for is-footnote and then prevent the drawing of the fieldshadings. FieldShading is an on-screen item only and never printed, so no unit test is possible. https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/99423 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
