https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154044
--- Comment #17 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #16) > Note also, that in 7.3, even selecting columns A:CA (i.e., more than 64 > columns) in step 2 didn't produce the same problem. The bibisected commit > 9e2d48b9e04f7ea895fb095699c32ed8a44eb129 suggests that it only modified a > single constant, and prior to it, selecting A:CA should still produce the > same problem for columns after BM. > > My strong suspicion is that there was some previous commit, that was the > actual regression (with columns after 64) - which could be bibisected. Oh, you are right. The real commit introduced this issue was author Luboš Luňák <[email protected]> 2022-02-16 13:19:29 +0100 committer Luboš Luňák <[email protected]> 2022-02-16 21:37:36 +0100 commit 823eb92025853d120c17790d1c8efde59f033c69 (patch) tree 8e4d0a07d952b73850f6c4b2241b5ed80a2978aa parent a717029e217621482ef799731f945090c6d6be4b (diff) do not allocate columns in ScTable::GetPattern() https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/161118 should fix it. Review appreciated -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
