https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158827
Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |NOTABUG See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79 | |787 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- This is not a bug. The optimal values of width available in Excel formats is chosen. There is no better option for *both* the default (0.75) and 1.75 exist, than Excel's "thin". See: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/qa/unit/data/README.cellborders?r=6777720 Try opening the ODS in Excel to see that Excel itself is unable to use different thickness, even when it definitely *is* in the file (ODS has it, of course). Try using 2.25 (Thick) and greater thickness, to see that it works, *when* the target file format allows. Use ODS, to make sure you use all the features supported by LibreOffice. If you use external file formats, limit yourself to the features supported by both LibreOffice and MS Office in that file format simultaneously, otherwise there is no way to ensure interoperability. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
