Hi Cor,
On Sat, 2011-11-05 at 16:50 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Just tried to install the daily build from 2011-11-02 on my Ubuntu:
> http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_Release_Configuration/master/2011-11-05_01.05.12/
As this keeps coming back, I was amazed to read:
> I install the builds in parallel:
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_in_parallel
It looks (potentially) highly problematic. I suggest we add a big
health warning to it.
It would (perhaps) be easier to change the install prefix and/or
installname for our tinderbox builds. I wonder if there is an easy way
to do that (Fridrich?) so we could just install the packages as-is.
Thomas, separately I wonder if this:
INSTALLDIRNAME=`echo AC_PACKAGE_NAME | tr '[[:upper:]]' '[[:lower:]]'`
AC_MSG_CHECKING([for install dirname])
if test -n "$with_install_dirname" -a "$with_install_dirname" != "no" -a
"$with_install_dirname" != "yes" ; then
INSTALLDIRNAME="$with_install_dirname"
fi
AC_MSG_RESULT([$INSTALLDIRNAME])
AC_SUBST(INSTALLDIRNAME)
The with_install_dirname stuff looks redundant - we could prolly hack
some of that out.
So we might be able to build real RPMs / DEBs that are
parallel-installable for these snapshots.
HTH,
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: [email protected]
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
