Hi all, On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 04:38:54PM +0800, Yifan Jiang wrote: > 1. Do we need components split in L10n tests? > > I have ever considered the leraning curve when l10n and function test > doesn't have a consistent scheme. But from reconsidering, it is probably > natural for a user to see such language split when clicking a > Localizatoin test group. Plus it reduces the test group size > significantly, which is my favorite as well. So I give up this concern :) > > Another question is still about how many cases will we have. One thing I > didn't mention is with this scheme, when we create a test case we need > to review all the cases to make sure they were not created > before. Currently we only have 23 cases, it is okay if we review all of > the cases summaries when creating a new one. But if we get even more > cases (> 50 > for example), it becomes painful and hard to manage.
I just remember we still have some artificial id information in test case summary like (w1, c2 etc.), which could resolve this concern to an operatable extent :) So I am fine with scheme D now. Best wishes, Yifan _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
