Nino wrote > >> how we give credits to people doing this work. > > Good question! (It's IMHO the question, how we measure meritocracy.) > > We have the commit count for devs, the edit count for wiki contributions, > so > what if we start with the number of reported bugs in a first > approximation? > > (In my eyes, not only the count but also the "value" of a contribution > should > count, but how to define the value? So, the count should be a good start) >
TDF doesn't give any credit. They do appreciate the work and have mentioned it several times. QA people don't write code, don't make changes to the wiki, don't create icons. There is no merit :) BTW value can't be measured because it's subjective. E.g. Devs just count the number of commits not what they consisted of. I have no idea what to count for QA. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-credits-for-people-doing-QA-tp3716290p3716356.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
