On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 09:55:10AM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote: > I have some explicit ideas on some of the items. > Should we attempt to exchange those before the meeting, or at least > mention them (briefly)?
In general, just mention a new topic as a oneliner to add to the agenda. If its something specific and detailed I would propose to add the text to the wiki add add the link to the agenda. Feel free to do so so for this call, although I fear with this being a first call we already have more than enough as-is, so dont be angry, if things get postponed to a later call. > Obviously QA work is not the same as development work, and maybe > people also (partly) step in from a different perspective. Thus a > one-to-one copy of the approach, that is so successful at the > developer side, will not do. gentoo and debian are just two successful example projects that are volunteer-only and do not do too much core development themselves -- indeed they do mostly release engineering and QA. And of course, we will simply copy LibreOffice development. As the examples show, QA can be volunteer-based and self-sustained -- independant of development. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
