Hi Rainer, all
It's my belief that we will have to rethink our release concept. > It is true that this model tends to accumulate regressions. Unfortunately it is not easy to measure if adding more features is attracting more users than repelling users because of regressions/unsolved problems... On a positive note see how far this has taken us since release 3.3.0 ;) Please excuse me that I can't tell anything more enthusiastic. > TBH I am quite enthusiastic that the long standing regression Bug #36982 (which caused data loss and was reported 10 months ago) was finally squashed. But I do agree that killing branches (without solving all regressions) means that users are being left behind as the project moves forward... Maybe branch 3.4.x should continue to be updated (in the same way that Mozilla keeps fixing bugs in version 3.6.x, with x currently at 28, even though the latest version is 11.0...) until at least all 3.3.x regressions are fixed??? Regards, Pedro
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
