On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote: > There is strong conflicting opinion between Bjoern and Rainer. I suggest > to decide this on the ESC or QA meeting.
It's on the agenda. > BTW: There was wrongly described Novell bugzilla. In fact, it has the > best solution, I have ever seen, for this particular problem. It has > heavily modified the interface. If you set the state NEEDEINFO, it shows > inputbox where you are forced to enter name of the infoprovider. The bug > remains assigned to the same person as it was before, so the info > provider does not need to think whom to assign the bug back. She just > removes the NEEDEINFO state by pressing a checkbox. So, the right > handling is intuitive, friendly and enforced. I'd love to push this to the list of work we want done on freedesktop bugzilla :-) hopefully someone (Bjoern?) was building a list of tasks we'd like to contract there - openID, and this and ... ? ATB, Michael. -- michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/