On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 16:54 +0200, Petr Mladek wrote:
> There is strong conflicting opinion between Bjoern and Rainer. I suggest
> to decide this on the ESC or QA meeting.

        It's on the agenda.

> BTW: There was wrongly described Novell bugzilla. In fact, it has the
> best solution, I have ever seen, for this particular problem. It has
> heavily modified the interface. If you set the state NEEDEINFO, it shows
> inputbox where you are forced to enter name of the infoprovider. The bug
> remains assigned to the same person as it was before, so the info
> provider does not need to think whom to assign the bug back. She just
> removes the NEEDEINFO state by pressing a checkbox. So, the right
> handling is intuitive, friendly and enforced.

        I'd love to push this to the list of work we want done on freedesktop
bugzilla :-) hopefully someone (Bjoern?) was building a list of tasks
we'd like to contract there - openID, and this and ... ?

        ATB,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.me...@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to