On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 11:06:03PM +0700, Korrawit Pruegsanusak wrote: > Hello Rainer, Bjoern, all, > > On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Rainer Bielefeld > <libreoff...@bielefeldundbuss.de> wrote: > > has already someone tested <http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/bibisect/> > > successfully and can contribute a short manual on > > <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect>? > > Sorry for late reply, but I've tested and updated the wiki. Please > feel free to add / edit / delete :) > > @Bjoern, could you please add some missing information, esp. in Versions > table?
Did it with the info so far. > Also, I'm thinking that what is the aim for re-compiling bibisect 3.5 > and 3.6 to have it in only one archive ... I'm thinking of using this > resource to create bibisect 3.4 instead. 3.4 is really a pain and the result of the bibisect might very well be that we got most of the errors in the one "big merge" -- in which bisecting cant work well. Also, I will not recompile the 3.5 stuff, I will just glue together the repos into one, so not that much ressources wasted there. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
