Joel Madero píše v Po 18. 06. 2012 v 09:32 -0700:
> Version 2, changed orientation and tried to take comments into
> account. Let me know what you all think.
It is much better readable. I finally got a better picture :-)
Well, I think that it still need some thinking. You set "inability to
safe" as major. I think that it should be blocker. The application
would be almost useless with this bug ;-)
I suggest the following changes in the top levels:
Q: "Does bug cause crash, loss of data[*], inability to install,
broken core function, e.g. inability to safe any writer
documents, print?
+ A: "yes":
=> Q: "Does it affect almost all users within everyday usage and
is it a regression?"
+ A: "yes" => blocker, highest, MAB
+ A: "no" => critical, high, MAB
I would leave the
+ A: "no"
=> Q: "Does bug involve a serious glitch such as tediously
slow, inability to open particular documents, install
some extensions, print on some printers?
+ A: "yes": => "major", high
IMHO, the rest might stay as is. Well, it would be great to create
several examples also for the other categories. I do not have power to
invent them now, though ;-)
[*] Note that data loss might be caused by incomplete import. If it is
not a regression, it might be marked by developers as an enhancement.
Note that it needs many developer/years to support some file formats.
OOXML format is described on several thousands of pages...
I am very happy with the progress and the state.
Thanks a lot for working on it.
Best Regards,
Petr
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
