Hi Rainer, On 2012-08-03 at 12:19 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> > I am sorry, it has been a terribly busy week :-( Fixed now, the update > > to RC4 should be offered. Thanks again for the testing! > > I did a quick test and recommendations weem to work in a perfect way: > - 3.5 users should update to 3.5.5 > - 3.6 testers should update to 3.6.0.4 Great, thanks! > The version info in the updater dialog IMHO is incomplete: > The Version with what I tested is correctly shown as 3.6.0.0.beta3, but > the recommended download shows 3.6.0 RC4, what is not wrong, but the > complete Version name is 3.6.0.4. > > I do not know whether there is an agreement how to call those versions, > I understood that we avoid "RC" and "Release" anywhere except as > additional information in the Bugzilla Version pickers. I plan to remove the RC information from there when the 3.6 is final, and will present just 3.6.0 in the update dialog. I think the testers of the pre-release versions know what is going on, and the real users will not see that, so I hope we are good :-) All the best, Kendy _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
