On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 19:33 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> I can assure you they are. The best way to get a bug solved is:
...
> Once you are there, it is orders of magnitude easier to go ahead with the bug.
Sure - the problem is then for developers to sift out these bugs where
a ton of good QA work has been done for them from the larger mass of
bugs where a ton of manual work is required first IMHO etc. :-)
It must be de-motivating to do a load of work making the bug easier to
fix, and then still no-one look at it :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
