Terrence Enger wrote: > I have played with it a little bit, and it looks really neat. > Thoughts arising ... > Hi Terrence,
thanks a lot for looking into this - > (3) That start-and-end, with nothing in between, takes about 28 > seconds. My admittedly wimpy machine could do that about 3000 > times a day. This does not bode well for heavy use of the tool. > That would be probably acceptable - since tasks could be distributed over many people? > (4) The "usually" in point (1) troubles me. One execution can produce > 14 levels of stack trace leading from my program statement `ldtp > import *` to message "socket.error: [Errno 111] Connection > refused". Subsequent executions do the expected start-and-end. > My newbie instinct shouts "timing issue". So, the next part of > the learning curve will be steeper. > That is a downer indeed - the last thing you want is unreliable tests. Curious how much of that is due to the usage of the accessibility API. Which platform / versions were you using again? Cheers, -- Thorsten
pgpLigeU3SpO4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
