On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 17:22 +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> currently we do not use that "QA-Contact" field, and I recommend to 
> leave it as it is.

Yes.  When the reporter inquired on the QA list, I recommended that he
file a bug report and put me in the cc field.  QA-contact is what
happened.

I am aware that being named as qa-contact has changed my behaviour in
a couple of ways: I have been more assertive in cutting fdo#58464 down
to just the crash than I would have been otherwise, and I have whined
here for help instead of just waiting quietly for somebody else to
move the bug report along when I do not know what to do next.

> 
> If somebody has a question he should write it in a comment, and if he 
> hopes that someone has special knowledge for the problem, he should add 
> that user to CC.

Ah, yes.  That would have been a better idea than my question to the
list.

> 
> This field MIGHT be useful to establish automated proceeding (mail to 
> mailing lists or whatever), If you have ideas we should discuss that, 
> and me or Joel can do the necessary administration in bugzilla.

Alas, no bright ideas here.  I just got in over my head by accident.

> 
> Best regards
> 
> 
> Rainer Bielefeld

Thank you for your patience.
Terry.


_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Reply via email to