jmadero wrote > Hi All, > > There are 15 bugs remaining that need to be triaged against 4.0, I'm > asking > Developer and/or QA staff to take a look at them to see if we can get this > list down. Goal is to be down to 0 by Friday but most of these are either > on platforms that I don't have or are beyond my skill set.
It makes more sense to leave a dynamic link than a static table (some of these are already checked by now). https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?query_format=advanced&bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&version=4.0.0.0.alpha1&version=4.0.0.0.beta1&version=4.1.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.0.0.0.beta2&version=4.0.0.1%20rc&product=LibreOffice Why do you consider a REOPENED bug as UNCONFIRMED? If a user reopens a previous bug it is a confirmation that the bug does exist so it should be equivalent to NEW and not to UNCONFIRMED... Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Version-4-0-UNCONFIRMED-bugs-tp4029443p4029596.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: [email protected] Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
