Kohei Yoshida schrieb:
No, those bugs were assigned to me originally by someone else, as part
of the very old workflow. I had no plan to work on them in the first
place.
Hi Kohei,
yes, you are completely right, those assignations were a legacy, and
it's a useful clearing up for those bugs to change the status if you do
not plan to work on them in near future.
Actually, I could go a step further and change the assignee of these
bugs with status NEW to the default assignee to further remove
ambiguity,
It was the the core of my question whether you wanted to have those Bug
in some kind of abeyance between NEW and ASSIGNED. I think currently we
do it so that bugs with Status ASSIGNED always have an assignee
different from <libreoffice-b...@lists.freedesktop.org>, and un-ASSIGNED
have the default assignee. So - if we do not see concerns here - I would
appreciate to follow your suggestion to change to the default
assignees of the not fixed Bugs in the query. That might encourage
volunteers to engage.
Without new arguments here I will add some more precise hints in the
Wiki on monday.
Thanks and best regards
Rainer
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
