Rainer Bielefeld píše v Po 08. 04. 2013 v 07:47 +0200: > Hi, > > I am thinking about a Version picker cleanup by removing most 3.3. Versions. > > Currently we have 14 different Versions in the picker. > We obviously still need 3.3.0 Beta 2, what is our Version for > "inherited" Bugs. > > Within the last 180 days we had 50 bug reports for the other 3.3. > Versions [1], all of them for releases. For Comparison: first 6 Months > 1220: 67 reports, 3 ones for releases [2], last 6 Months of 2012 55 > ones, 3 ones for RC [3]. > > For 3.3 we have no bibisecting, so that it is impossible for QA to > narrow down appearance of bug precisely, and I doubt that for developers > it sould make a big difference whether the report is for 3.3.0 RC3 of > 3.3.0 RC4. > > So I believe we should mark the not-release-3.3 as inactive, what means > they will stay for the bugs where they are used, but can not be used for > new bug reports (except by the LibO Bugzilla Administrators) because > they will no longer be shown in the Versions selector. > > If I do not see concerns here I will do the remove End of the week.
Great idea. It makes sense. => +1 Best Regards, Petr _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
