On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 10:21:31PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > Apologies for my lack of technical skills, but...what does this mean > exactly? In terms of QA being able to use it, is it ready? Almost > ready?
The stuff that I pushed would allow you to build the bibisect repo if you would understand how it is intended to be used -- which is the trouble, as it is severelt underdocumented right now. > And for the bibisect repo, that would be up to most recent > commit? The one I have sitting on my local disc? The last version it contains is 4.0.0.0.beta1. It does not contain any master commits -- so e.g. you can see were it broke between libreoffice-4-0-branch-point and the libreoffice-3.6.4.3. But it has all the microreleases e.g. 3.6.2.1, 3.6.2.2, 3.6.3.1 ... so you can see if and where is broke _in_ one major release. So its a bibisect repo without any of the intermediate steps on master, but with all released versions (including rcs and alpha/betas). Im packing what I have right now and will try to upload it today, I guess just playing around with it might make it easier to see what I mean. ;) Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
