On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Another whiteboard status post. Should we just move forward with removing
> bibisect3* whiteboard status'? Now that bibisect40 has everything, there's
> really no need for these.
+1
> My proposal:
>
> bibisectrequest -- needs a bibisect test done
> bibisected - bibisect occured, regardless of what version of bibisect
> prebibisect - bibisect useless
I believe that there are a couple of different bibisect repositories
right now with different starting dates (?) If so, I'm a bit reticent
to use the same whiteboard status ("prebibisect") if an issue might be
bibisectable in another repo. That being said, I'm going to guess that
there aren't a ton of bugs marked as "prebibisect" right now, so it's
probably something we could sort out later.
--R
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
