Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote > I'll try asking about the 3.6.6 Thanks! ;) Tommy wrote > I think that the whole portable X-LibO repository from winPenPack could be > a valuable tool for QA guys. It is indeed. Actually it seems that the developers of wPP are more in the Open Source spirit than the guys at PortableApps. Maybe TDF should buddy up with the wPP also (or instead?) Tommy wrote > IMHO it's much easier to deal with no-install packages rather than > parallel installations. It is a double edged sword. On one hand it is indeed much easier. On the other hand since the packages need to be modified it is difficult to be sure if the observed behaviour is caused by LibreOffice or the hacks used to make it Portable... As Florian said the parallel install uses the same "vanilla" binaries and registry keys so it is less modified than a portable version. But thanks to you I'm now a fan of X-LibreOffice :) BTW One very important detail: you can run as many X-LibreOffice versions simultaneously and at the same time as the standard install AND parallel installs. Goodbye PortableApps, Hello winPenPack :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Portable-vs-Parallel-which-one-is-better-tp4056781p4057055.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
