On Sat, 2013-05-25 at 10:44 -0700, Joel Madero wrote: > I finally got around to updating the wiki: > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Whiteboard#Bibisect > > Let's not use all the other options now and stick with: > > bibisected > PreBibisect > bibisectrequest
So, considering the possibility of updating wiki page HowToBibisect in line with the reduction in the number of whiteboard values, I wonder: (*) The explanation of whiteboard status PreBibisect says Only use this f you are using the daily bibisect package or the bibisect40 package, as the tagged version does not go back as far. I suggest Only use this if you are using the 4.0 bibisect package or the 3.5 bibisect package, as the tagged versions in the other bibisect packages do not go back as far. If the suggestion is not right, then my understanding of the bibisect packages is in urgent need of correction. Help! (*) Should existing whiteboard words "bibisect40bugs", "bibisect36bugs", and "bibisect35bugs" be changed to "bibisectrequest"? Is it worth the flurry of emails and updated date-last-changed fields? Only for open bugs, perhaps? The use of fewer whiteboard values hereafter will make the old values useless for queries anyway, right? Thanks, Terry. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/