On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 01:58:45PM +0100, Tommy wrote: > see also this chart: > http://snipurl.com/28ew3u5
Looking at that and other charts, some guestimates: - QA is doing great at confirming bugs from UNCONFIRMED->NEW as UNCONFIRMED goes down - QA/development is precise in telling people what is needed as NEEDINFO stays constant - development fixes ~1000 issues in 6 months (one release cycle) which is good - QA finds some ~1000 duplicates in 6 months (one release cycle) which is also good - QA closes some ~1000 issues as invalid in 6 months (one release cycle) which is good too - our NEW bug count is still growing, but is slowing down and now at ~1000 more bugs in NEW in the last 8 months So both QA and development are doing a really good job and are getting better and better. Ideally, we should get the NEW count (excluding enhancement requests) to be constant too: we are not quite there yet, but improving. And with currently 1487 of the 6407 NEW bugs being actually enhancement requests, the stats are somewhat muddy there. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
