Markus Mohrhard schreef op 15/01/14 12:49: > > You can help by fixing the crashes or validation errors. Additionally > there are a number of scripting tasks to make the information a bit > pretty. I did make a little python stats script that can display the total number of passers/crashers per mimetype, that is parsed to csv format. Easy to open using LibreOffice (of course ;-) ) and do some calculations/visualization on it. I guess that's already a good starting point for stats, but sadly I don't have time to develop it any further next month or so (exams, master thesis, ...). > > IMHO it makes no sense to treat them as normal bugs or check the bug > reports. The bug numbers in there are just part of the name of the > file. It does not mean that they have any relations to the bug report. > From my point of view the crash testing is more a developer tool that > we use similar to unit tests to improve quality. From a QA perspective > I think you can just enjoy the numbers and the improved quality. True. For a non-developer, but QA volunteer, I am only interested in the numbers. (trend per mimetype, and general trend).
Kind regards, Joren _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
