Hi, On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:01:21PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > == short term == > > To keep the highest=MAB equivalence clean, some regular (weekly?) checking for > bugs that are priority:highest and not a MAB would be needed. Such bugs could > be seen as "proposed MABs" and either be: > - promoted to a MAB with the usual procedure (rationale etc.) > - or respectfully rejected and bumped to priority:high > > Someone volunteering for this task? > > If so, it would be interesting: > - how many such bugs there are each week > - what is their quality (as in: how many are good MABs? how many are well > triaged?)
So to ease this work, I created two stored queries: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=mab-not-highest https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&namedcmd=highest-not-mab QA volunteers concerned with bug priorization are encouraged to check these and either move them in a consistent highest and MAB or a consistent not-highest and not-MAB state. Note that usual workflow is still in place, so if you mark something as a MAB you should provide a good rationale. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
