On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:43:43PM -0400, Terrence Enger wrote: > From the QA meeting minutes: > > > (*) SUGGESTION: Standardization of our summary field for Bugzilla > > (*) Or: When searching for one phrase, display results from a > < similar one (e.g. "image" -> "picture" or "graphic")
Hmm, Im uncertain as to what the goal is here and if its reachable. - Reporters (end users) will most likely ignore an attempt at using a standardized vocabulary - Triagers will most likely have a good grip on all the words used for one topic and might even derive additional information from the nuances (as Terrence shows here ;) ) - Ultimately: Who should be the consumer of these queries/standardisation? How does it help devs to address the impportant and urgent bugs quicker? Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
