I suggest everyone ignore this On 07/30/2014 10:38 AM, Urmas wrote: > Interesting things happen in LO QA community. > > Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay > Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I > —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but > than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. > Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, > Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the > adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact > with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? > Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I > would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its > public-faced parts being the QA community. Language like this is completely unacceptable and it's not the first time that you've been told this. With that, I have no other comment on any other part of this.
Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
