op 30-07-14 19:38, Urmas schreef:
Interesting things happen in LO QA community. Instead of reading 4.3 release notes, as an adequate person would, "Jay Philips" in comment 15 starts being rude (and authoritative) to me, which I —knowing about the dreck open source generally attracts— can look over; but than he snitches me over to the moderator, which is unacceptable. Fistly, is that 'person' going to excuse itself?, Secondly, I would like to get an official response: is LO a project where the adequate and sane people work, and it is safe for normal people to interact with, or is it some Gnome-like community of 1½ faggots in a circle? Providing a reputation of LO as a commercial-grade professional software, I would like to receive some explanations about faggots and snitches in its public-faced parts being the QA community.
Urmas, I checked bug 81041 trace. We are and will remain a respectful community. That is fixed in our foundation (TDF). If you disagree with others I´d advice: discuss via other means then bug reports + mailing lists. Look for the dialogue and discussion. Luc
<<attachment: luc_castermans.vcf>>
_______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
