Florian Reisinger wrote > The bigger problem is the following: > User A submitted a bug #123. A QA closes this bug as RESOLVED WFM. User A > disagrees and puts the state to > 1) REOPENED > 2) NEEDINFO > > Sorry to say, but this "error" will continue...
+1 Maybe QA people become aware of this unlogic rule but most users will obviously choose REOPENED (because in English that is what makes sense) Unless you (Joel) plan to block users (including the person who submitted the bug) from changing the status, this will happen again. IMO blocking users is a BAD option... Just my 2 cents. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-REPOENED-Status-tp4117474p4117517.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
