On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any "retest pings"
there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the
pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the
Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate
that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-)
Indeed. For everything else, lets please refrain from adding automated
messages
to EasyHacks, if possible -- they are supposed to be read by an
enthusiastic
new contributor and too many comments (esp. over 10 comments and
automated
ones) are quite a demotivating turn-off.
Best,
Bjoern
I understand your point and you are both right.
If we do another "ping retest" thing we will keep the easy hacks out of it
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
