On Tue, 09 Dec 2014 05:29:23 +0100, Robinson Tryon
<bishop.robin...@gmail.com> wrote:
....
How do we decide which bugs to tag? I suggest that for now we only tag
backportRequests if the bug was reported against an active Still or
Fresh branch.
So to put that into context with our current builds, here's my proposal:
If you test a bug reported against 4.3 and find
1) It's fixed in master, AND
2) It's not fixed in 4.3.5.1 (the latest build on the 4.3 branch)
Then change status -> WFM, and add "bibisectRequest backportRequest"
to the Whiteboard.
I think this is the easiest and more practical solution.
we should also alert the most active bibisecter that their job in these
bugs is different...
they usually look for the version were the bug appears first, this time
where the bug is finally gone.
it's kind of reverse bibisecting... that program was ideated to find bugs
but you can also use it to find fixes.
For all other cases, if it's fixed in master, then (just) change status
-> WFM.
Best,
--R
_______________________________________________
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
