Hey All, > On 06.01.2015 23:58, Joel Madero wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> So I suppose we'll start chunking into the next set relatively quickly. >> I was thinking at the end of January doing anything 22 months or more, >> slowly decrease this to 12 months. I don't want to hit all of these at >> once as there are already nearly 1600. So I think slowly going from 22, >> 20, 18...etc... until we're down to 12 months and then run both this >> ping as well as the NEEDINFO ping every month on the 1st. Let me know >> how this sounds. > i think pinging NEW bugs in the same interval as NEEDINFO bugs is wrong > - the interval for NEW bugs should be *at least* twice as long, perhaps > 4x, because the NEW bugs are already confirmed whereas the NEEDINFO ones > are not and are likely to be closed INVALID, and we have to take care > not to annoy people *regularly* too often for every confirmed bug. > > of course, in the unlikely case that say 50% of pinged NEW bugs turn out > to be fixed then i'm wrong :)
Let me clarify, the NEW bugs will only be pinged if they are 1 or more years old, but the ping will happen every month (so on the 1st of the month I'll check for NEW bugs that haven't changed in a year), for NEEDINFO that time frame is 6 months. Just the ping itself will happen on the 1st, but the time frame for the query is different for each. Best, Joel _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
